Game checklist was also used in order to redesign the different parts of the game, consequently, we design a board game of these young children’s responses. Result of this part were used in promoting our game according to the result of fun toolkit.
Further research will try to identify any ordering effects of each method and redundancies of the questions. However, there were some inconsistencies between the results of individual tools in the Fun toolkit and some of the constructs being measured in the This or That method. The experiences of each were captured by using 4 evaluation instrument in fun toolkit including: smileyometer, the fun sorter, the again-again, This or That method, The results showed that the Fun Toolkit and This or That method showed similar results and were able to establish a preference for one game over the other. First we sketch our primary ideas and then we design our first board game prototype and evaluate it by focus group in order to gather children opinion and then redesign it for further evaluation, after that we select two computer game about recycling, in this part 20 children participate in evaluating two games by fun toolkit. This paper use different methods include focus group, Fun toolkit, and game checklist for designing board game about recycling. Over the past decade, many new evaluation methods have developed for evaluating user experience with children, but the results of these studies have tended to be reported in the isolation of other techniques.
So, they can cultivate the positive changes in the future. Due to a progressive deterioration of our planet and its resources, environmental education has become important and children are required to understand environmental issues at an early ages.
0 kommentar(er)
